<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: It begs the question, why are you such an annoying pedant?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://iwilldare.com/2010/11/it-begs-the-question-why-are-you-such-an-annoying-pedant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://iwilldare.com/2010/11/it-begs-the-question-why-are-you-such-an-annoying-pedant/</link>
	<description>A little bit of heaven &#38; A whole lot of hell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:14:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: clare		</title>
		<link>https://iwilldare.com/2010/11/it-begs-the-question-why-are-you-such-an-annoying-pedant/#comment-26401</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clare]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://iwilldare.com/?p=9637#comment-26401</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[haha! when i read the title of that i thought &quot;god, i HATE it when people use that phrase totally wrongly&quot;. :-) then i read your post.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha! when i read the title of that i thought &#8220;god, i HATE it when people use that phrase totally wrongly&#8221;. 🙂 then i read your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: M-----l		</title>
		<link>https://iwilldare.com/2010/11/it-begs-the-question-why-are-you-such-an-annoying-pedant/#comment-26380</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M-----l]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 21:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://iwilldare.com/?p=9637#comment-26380</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I stopped using the word douche when you told me to, but I&#039;m going to continue begging questions because the site you linked to is dumb.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stopped using the word douche when you told me to, but I&#8217;m going to continue begging questions because the site you linked to is dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jodi		</title>
		<link>https://iwilldare.com/2010/11/it-begs-the-question-why-are-you-such-an-annoying-pedant/#comment-26379</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jodi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://iwilldare.com/?p=9637#comment-26379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I like that. . . rhetorical fallacy lacking the structure to even be a logical fallacy. I bet you&#039;d have gotten better than a B- in Logic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that. . . rhetorical fallacy lacking the structure to even be a logical fallacy. I bet you&#8217;d have gotten better than a B- in Logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kurtis		</title>
		<link>https://iwilldare.com/2010/11/it-begs-the-question-why-are-you-such-an-annoying-pedant/#comment-26378</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurtis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://iwilldare.com/?p=9637#comment-26378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hm. For the page of explanation you link to, I think they do a poor job of explaining the phrase&#039;s meaning. It says that people misunderstand &quot;question.&quot; What people really misunderstand is &quot;beg,&quot; which in this case means &quot;avoid,&quot; not &quot;entreat.&quot; The term &quot;question,&quot; means pretty much what you think it does. It might be better to say &quot;it begs the REAL question,&quot; to make things clearer. Or better yet, avoid the phrase entirely. Say &quot;it sidesteps the real question.&quot; Say &quot;You&#039;re presuming we all agree on _____ and we don&#039;t.&quot; Or say &quot;That&#039;s a circular argument.&quot;

Or as Ricky Gervais would put it: &quot;YOU&#039;RE TALKING SHIT!&quot;

I would also say that it&#039;s a rhetorical fallacy, not a logical one. That might be too fine a distinction, but I think of logical fallacies of being formal ones, and rhetorical as informal. Most fallacies are rhetorical. They lack the formal structure to even be a logical fallacy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. For the page of explanation you link to, I think they do a poor job of explaining the phrase&#8217;s meaning. It says that people misunderstand &#8220;question.&#8221; What people really misunderstand is &#8220;beg,&#8221; which in this case means &#8220;avoid,&#8221; not &#8220;entreat.&#8221; The term &#8220;question,&#8221; means pretty much what you think it does. It might be better to say &#8220;it begs the REAL question,&#8221; to make things clearer. Or better yet, avoid the phrase entirely. Say &#8220;it sidesteps the real question.&#8221; Say &#8220;You&#8217;re presuming we all agree on _____ and we don&#8217;t.&#8221; Or say &#8220;That&#8217;s a circular argument.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or as Ricky Gervais would put it: &#8220;YOU&#8217;RE TALKING SHIT!&#8221;</p>
<p>I would also say that it&#8217;s a rhetorical fallacy, not a logical one. That might be too fine a distinction, but I think of logical fallacies of being formal ones, and rhetorical as informal. Most fallacies are rhetorical. They lack the formal structure to even be a logical fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
