<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: i named my cat after this man	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://iwilldare.com/2005/03/i-named-my-cat-after-this-man/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://iwilldare.com/2005/03/i-named-my-cat-after-this-man/</link>
	<description>A little bit of heaven &#38; A whole lot of hell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 06:15:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: tiptoptom		</title>
		<link>https://iwilldare.com/2005/03/i-named-my-cat-after-this-man/#comment-10656</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tiptoptom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://iwilldare.com/?p=4614#comment-10656</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[During the constitutional debates in 1787, James Madison said, &quot;in England, at this day, if elections were open to all classes of people, the property of landed proprietors would be insecure. An agrarian law would soon take place.&quot;

He continued, &quot;our government ought to secure the permanent interests of the country against innovation,&quot; putting in place checks and balances in order to &quot;protect the minority of the opulent against the majority.&quot; 

Those &quot;without property, or the hope of acquiring it, cannot be expected to sympathize sufficiently with its rights.&quot;

Kind of disturbing -- basically limiting democracy to protect the rich and maintain the economic status quo.

Anyway, I still think the constitution is a pretty amazing document, and I like Madison fine. But most of those founding father guys were all for democracy and freedom as long as it didn&#039;t threaten their privileged positions.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the constitutional debates in 1787, James Madison said, &#8220;in England, at this day, if elections were open to all classes of people, the property of landed proprietors would be insecure. An agrarian law would soon take place.&#8221;</p>
<p>He continued, &#8220;our government ought to secure the permanent interests of the country against innovation,&#8221; putting in place checks and balances in order to &#8220;protect the minority of the opulent against the majority.&#8221; </p>
<p>Those &#8220;without property, or the hope of acquiring it, cannot be expected to sympathize sufficiently with its rights.&#8221;</p>
<p>Kind of disturbing &#8212; basically limiting democracy to protect the rich and maintain the economic status quo.</p>
<p>Anyway, I still think the constitution is a pretty amazing document, and I like Madison fine. But most of those founding father guys were all for democracy and freedom as long as it didn&#8217;t threaten their privileged positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
