<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: bewildered	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://iwilldare.com/2004/05/bewildered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://iwilldare.com/2004/05/bewildered/</link>
	<description>A little bit of heaven &#38; A whole lot of hell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 16:13:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rich		</title>
		<link>https://iwilldare.com/2004/05/bewildered/#comment-9410</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 16:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://iwilldare.com/?p=4047#comment-9410</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wish I could help but its hard to tell what the problem is.  I&#039;ll be thinking about you.  
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I could help but its hard to tell what the problem is.  I&#8217;ll be thinking about you.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dweebie		</title>
		<link>https://iwilldare.com/2004/05/bewildered/#comment-9409</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dweebie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 14:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://iwilldare.com/?p=4047#comment-9409</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This week&#039;s New Yorker is exciting for you bloggers, the May 31st issue, under Ink, &quot;A Book in You&quot; tells about a woman whose job it is to read blogs and determine who would be good to write a book, so keep at it.  Processing is good for your writing projects, but somehow it seems that stream of consciousness, unrehearsed writing is more cleansing for the soul, plus there&#039;s a freshness to it that we all can relate to.  Your blog site contains a forum for both styles of writing, so don&#039;t be too hard on yourself, follow your heart, not your heart throb.  --in my humble opinion]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s New Yorker is exciting for you bloggers, the May 31st issue, under Ink, &#8220;A Book in You&#8221; tells about a woman whose job it is to read blogs and determine who would be good to write a book, so keep at it.  Processing is good for your writing projects, but somehow it seems that stream of consciousness, unrehearsed writing is more cleansing for the soul, plus there&#8217;s a freshness to it that we all can relate to.  Your blog site contains a forum for both styles of writing, so don&#8217;t be too hard on yourself, follow your heart, not your heart throb.  &#8211;in my humble opinion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: FFJ		</title>
		<link>https://iwilldare.com/2004/05/bewildered/#comment-9408</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FFJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 12:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://iwilldare.com/?p=4047#comment-9408</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[what the H is going on????  E-mail me at work....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what the H is going on????  E-mail me at work&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
